Critical Commentary Related to "Rappaccini's Daughter"
Critical Commentary Related to "Rappaccini's Daughter"
Beata Beatrix by D.G. Rossetti(courtesy of the Tate Gallery, London)
John L. Idol, Jr., and Melinda M. Ponder in Hawthorne and Women:
Engendering and Expanding the Hawthorne Tradition, describe the
heroines in "The Birth-mark" and "Rappaccini's Daughter" as "victims"
who are penalized by men who try to re-make them. (courtesy of University
of Massachusetts Press)
In "Stowe and Hawthorne" from Hawthorne and Women: Engendering and Expanding
the Hawthorne Tradition, James D. Wallace describes Harriet Beecher Stowe's
portrayal of a young man who delights in "Rappaccini's Daughter" and escapes
from his masculine world by entering the enchanted
garden and connecting to the mysterious Beatrice. (courtesy of University
of Massachusetts Press)
Carol Bensick in "Re-Allegorizing 'Rappaccini's Daughter'" from New
Essays on Hawthorne's Major Tales argues for the benefit of reading "Rappaccini's
Daughter as an allegory in light of the issues
raised through an examination of intellectual history. (courtesy of Cambridge
University Press)
In Nathaniel Hawthorne: a Study of the Short Fiction, Nancy Bungee
comments on a thematic issue at the center of the
tale. (courtesy of Twayne
Publishers)
In her lecture "Work and Money in Hawthorne's Fiction," Claudia Durst Johnson
comments on the nature of male ambition in "Rappaccini's
Daughter."
In his lecture "The Meanings of Hawthorne's Women," Richard Millington
poses a literary experiment considering how "Rappaccini's
Daughter" might differ had it been written by Margaret Fuller.
Richard Millington also comments on the continuing
presence and effect of male ambition in many of Hawthorne's stories.